Archives - October, 2009



27 Oct 09


Easy Diet Tip for the days you aren’t fasting:

Eat one small meal

Eat one medium meal

Eat one large meal

Have a couple snacks when you feel like it.

It doesn’t matter which meal is which size, so play with it and see what you like best.

My personal routine is typically medium breakfast (600-ish calories), Small lunch (300-400-ish Calories) big dinner (800-1000+ Calories) and a couple snacks

Obviously what is ’small, medium, and large’ depends on you, your goals and your activity levels…so you need to personalize it a bit, but regardless this is a great tool for preventing every meal from becoming a feast.

Simple and effective.

BP


Filed under: Weight loss, weight loss success

Trackback Uri






23 Oct 09


I spend a lot of my time reviewing research. Enough time that I can tell you that there are definitely GREAT research papers, and then there are HORRIBLE ones that make you scratch your head trying to figure out how they ever were published in the first place.

Truthfully there are many more papers that seem to fall in the horrible category the truth is, even the worst paper ever published still has some value.

There is no such thing as research with absolutely no value.

While these seems like a typical ‘Pilon ramble’ let me assure you…we’re talking about bodybuilding.

You see for some reason, over the last decade we decided that bodybuilding is dumb, useless, and a complete waste of time.

We junked bodybuilding and replaced it with functional training, sports specific training and the like.

We threw out bodybuilding before we completely understood it.

And just like research papers, there is no such thing as a completely useless type of exercise.

There are things to be learned from bodybuildling.

Good things.

**Before I go any further I need to be clear..there is next to NO research on bodybuilding.

Everything you read on line or in magazines is nothing more than theories and conjecture.

What I’m about to write is no different – these are my theories on bodybuiding.**

Body building and weight training are NOT the same thing – they are close cousins maybe, but they are not interchangeable.

Weight training involved using your muscles to move a weight.

In power-lifting the goal is to move as much weight as possible. In Olympic lifting the goal is to perfect moving a weight through a certain ‘movement’ as efficiently as possible.

In bodybuilding the goal is to contract your muscles using weight to add some resistance.

Similar but very different.

In fact, while things like Olympic lifting and Power-lifting are definitely ‘weight training’ I am starting to think that body building is ‘muscle training’.

Again – similar, but very different.

I think the difference lies in the mental approach.

Here’s an example.

Stand up and let your arms hang at your sides.

Now, with your arms still hanging flex your biceps as tightly as possible (don’t curl your arms yet, just leave them hanging but flexed).

Keeping that same intense level of flex, slowly curl your arm up at the elbow until its fully curled – concentrating on the flex the entire way.

Pause for a second or two at the top then while keeping your bicep flex, slowly lower your arm back down.

That is a bodybuildling bicep curl.

Now imagine this same degree of concentration while holding a weight.

You are using weight to resist the contraction, but the mindset is all about the contraction and not the weight.

Using this technique, a guy that can curl 60 pound dumbbells for sets of 6-8 may only be able to curl 40-45’s before he has to break his concentration on the contraction and start thinking about moving the weight.

From my experience, you can lift a helluva lot more thinking about the weight then when you are thinking about the muscle…but if you want to make a muscle bigger..then there may be something in this approach.

My random speculation -

In the muscles that grow well for you..I bet you really ‘feel’ the exercises that you normally choose.

For the muscles that don’t grow well for you…I bet you really ‘feel’ the weight.

For me, I feel the contraction in my chest every time I do bench press or dumbbell press.

But shoulder press, I feel the weight moving. I’m strong on this lift, but I just don’t ‘feel’ it in my shoulders.

Coincidentally, my chest is much more developed then my shoulders.

(like I said, we’re theorizing here)

So, if the feel is important, then what do bodybuilders do right?

1) They pick exercises that they feel in the muscles they want to work.

2) They do things like ‘preexhaust’ a muscle to ‘help’ it feel an exericise.

3) They concentrate on the muscle in question during the workout.

All of these techniques are things we through way in favor of becoming Olympic lifting /power-lifting /functional training/athletic training wannabees (not meant to be derogatory, just saying..)

But, if your goal is simply to grow a specific muscle, or group of muscles in order to change the way your body looks, then there may be something we can learn from the way a bodybuilder approaches ‘working a muscle’.

In the end, the answer to losing weight will be to eat less, and the answer to building muscle is working out ‘more’ but this may be one little step towards a better definition of ‘more’.

BP


Filed under: Body Building, muscle building

Trackback Uri






20 Oct 09


The truth is, I’m having a crazy  busy day…funny how Monday’s are like that.

But, I really wanted to write a post about diet books today, and I had a point that I REALLY wanted to share with you, but I simply did not have  enough time to write a nice wordy post…so I quickly jotted some notes down and realized that they had almost formed some sort of really poor  haiku.

…so smiled and had some fun with it.

I hope you like it.

The thing with Diet Books -

They all have to have a catch

This part is what sells.


Eat less and move more

The truth with no hook, no catch.

No secret science.


Hormones and Enzymes

Make for great diet book titles

but the truth remains -


Eat less and move more.

BP


Filed under: Weight Loss Science, Weight loss, weight loss success

Trackback Uri






15 Oct 09


I found this quote on the Post Secret Blog…

“I know it means I’m going to be alone forever, but I can’t stop eating.”

To me, this is a strong and rather shocking reminder of how messed up our relationships with food can become.

Many of us use food for much more than just fuel for our bodies.

We use food as something to stress and obsess ABOUT. We use it to define ourselves and our life choices.

We can also use our food to COPE with our life-stress and obsessions, as a defense mechanism and as a security blanket.

Either way, with the wrong relationships food alone can be a damaging obsession in our lives.

My advice? Avoid viewing food as a cure-all, and see it for what it is ==> A fuel for your body, and a reason to get together with other people.

Food is nourishment and food is celebration.

Eat less while enjoying the foods you eat and don’t let your foods control you. My opinion is that this is the key to having a healthy relationship with food, AND a healthy, lean body.

BP


Filed under: Healthy Ramblings, Obsessive Compulsive Eating, Weight loss, weight loss success

Trackback Uri






14 Oct 09


3 guys sign up for a research study on the muscle building effects of weight training.

None of them have ever lifted weights before, and all three are between the ages of 20 and 21.

At the start of the study they weighed between 130 and 143 pounds (light by North American Standards)

Guy A – 130 pounds
Guy B – 138 pounds
Guy C – 143 pounds

For their given age and weight, each guy has about normal to slightly below average levels of lean body mass (I’m assuming the guys were between 5′6″ and 5′8″).

Guy A – LBM = 121 pounds (about 10% BF)
Guy B – LBM = 118 pounds (about 10% BF)
Guy C – LBM = 132 pounds (about 7.5% BF)

These numbers also make each guy exceptionally lean.

For their given age and weight, each guy has lower than expected levels of skeletal muscle mass. (We would expect about 50% of LBM to be skeletal Muscle).

Guy A -45 pounds Skeletal Muscle (about 37% of LBM!!!) Expected would be about 60 pounds.
Guy B – 43 pounds Skeletal Muscle (about 36% of LBM!!!) Expected would be about 59 pounds.
Guy C – 55 pounds Skeletal Muscle (about 41% of LBM!!!) Expected would be about 66 pounds.

Each guys bench press max confirms that this is their first time weight training.

Guy A – 95 pounds
Guy B – 90 pounds
Guy C – 130 pounds

So, these three guys who are light by North American Standards, with incredibly low levels of Body Fat and incredibly low levels of Skeletal muscle mass start a weight training program consisting of 3 workouts a week for 4 months.

Their workout program looked like this:

Squats 3 sets of 8-12 reps
Leg Extensions 3 sets of 8-12 reps
Hamstring Curls 3 sets of 8-12 reps
Bench Press 3 sets of 8-12 reps
Lat Pull downs 3 sets of 8-12 reps

As they progressed through their workouts their weights were increased to make sure they failed on each set within the 8-12 rep range.

At the end of the four month period all three guys increased their body weight and Lean Body Mass by about 5.5 pounds…which is pretty close to the average found in most research trials studying weight training for this length of time.

Now, here is where things get a little quirky.

These numbers seemed plausible, given the fact that these 3 men were underweight, under-muscled and new to weigh training.

But what doesn’t make sense is the following…Two of these guys gained MORE muscle then they did Lean Body Mass!

Guy A gained 9 pounds of muscle while only gaining 4.5 pounds of LBM.
Guy B gained 11 pounds of muscle while only gaining 4.5 pounds of LBM.
Guy C gained 7.7 pounds of muscle while gaining 7.7 pounds of LBM.

So, even with their impressive gains in muscle, their muscle mass is still below where it should be (50% of lean body mass) and somewhere along the way two of them lost around 5 pounds of LBM…liver removed maybe?

Bottom line – you have to be skeptical of muscle building research. Obviously this group of 3 guys are not a good subset of the rest of the population. Specifically, they are probably not a good representation of you or I.

They are were their early twenties, were very light,  were very lean, and had very little muscle mass at the start of this research study. Their workout was far form extraordinary but they did manage to gain almost exactly the amount of weight, LBM and strength that we would expect from a 4 month long supervised workout program.

Despite this their was obviously some discrepancy in the measures of skeletal muscle mass…this discrepancy either caused

A) Exceptionally low measurements of skeletal muscle at the beginning of the study.

B) Exceptionally high measurement of skeletal muscle at the end of the study.

The only other possible scenario is that two of the subjects somehow lost between 5-6 pounds of LBM somewhere during the weight training process.

Obviously…something is up.

But this is extremely important, and is a great example of why you need to ANALYZE every study that you read.

Otherwise, you could quickly go over the abstract of this study and say that “Research proves that full body weight training 3 times per week can cause you to gain up to 11 pounds of pure muscle in 4 months!”

BP

PS – Interestingly, this study was performed by the same people who are finding amazing muscle gaining results from ‘blood flow occlusion training”…makes you wonder.

PPS – There is one last thing missing from this study..has to do with the small number of subjects…something that would be next to impossible to calculate with only three subjects….Can you guess?

Abe T. Br J Sports Med, 2003.


Filed under: Weight Training, muscle building

Trackback Uri






9 Oct 09


Happy Something fun for Friday


Filed under: Healthy Ramblings

Trackback Uri






7 Oct 09


Weight loss is simple.

Most people who have tried Eat Stop Eat can attest to this.

Find an easy and effective way to eat less that fits into your lifestyle, and slowly but surely, you will lose weight.

Nutrition on the other hand..not so simple.

People LOVE to try and “Black and White” nutrition.

Good or Bad, Yes or No.

The truth is, we do most of this prematurely.

Take Trans fats.

Evil. Bad. The Darth Vader of foods.

Yet Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) is a trans fat being studied for its anti-cancer properties.

Actually, to be fair, it is being studied for its POTENTIAL anti-cancer properties.

The point is this – The basics of human physiology…pretty simple (on paper). We know what makes us over-fat, and we know what makes us not over-fat.

But Classifying foods as completely bad or completely good, we need to be careful with.

Obviously, the Trans Fats found in chemical altered saturated-fat substitutes and commercial cooking oils are something we should avoid. But does this make all Trans-fats bad? Probably not.

Reminds of ten years ago when “all Fat” was bad. That kind of classic “painting them all with the same brush” mentality failed us then and it will fail us again.

Bottom line, be weary of blanketing nutrition statements. More often than not, they are simply a way to keep you from changing the channel while watching the 6 o’clock news.

“Coming up next the secret ingredient in your food that is killing you”

You get the drift.

BP


Filed under: Healthy Ramblings

Trackback Uri






2 Oct 09


A quick good news / not so good news post today about building muscle and fasting.

The Good news – Research shows (once again) that even 72 hours of fasting (way longer than I recommend) does not change whole body protein turnover or measures of protein oxidation (you’re not losing muscle).

The not so good news news – The same research also shows that that massive doses of insulin and amino acids after a fast are no more anabolic then they are in the fed state. In other words fasting didn’t some how turn you into a muscle building monster.

Bottom line – Eat Stop Eat is supported by EVEN more research showing it’s a great way to lose fat without losing muscle! You’re not losing massive muscle when you are fasting and you are not building massive amounts of new muscle because you are coming out of a fast (there’s no magic muscle building effects from the post-fast period).

This is an important part of the Eat Stop Eat philosophy.

Once you complete your 24 hour fast, simply pretend the fast never happened. Don’t do any special post-fast rituals, don’t over eat, don’t make some special amino acid/protein cocktail.

Just resume eating as you would have on any other normal day.

The point of Eat Stop Eat is to take a break from food, and then go back to doing what you were doing before you took your break.

As soon as you start coming up with special ways to eat and things to do at the end of your fast you’re complicating things and missing the point of the simplicity of Eat Stop Eat.

Finally, as always…it’s the way you workout that decides if you are building muscle, and the way you eat that decides if you are losing fat.

BP

(Gjedsted et al, 2009)


Filed under: muscle building

Trackback Uri